Chi Che

Methodology

Research tools

Two indices for needs assessment. Upload a file and calculate here, or download the toolkit and run it in a spreadsheet. Both tools are signed to the IJERE paper.

PNI modifiedChe, Chaemchoy & Siribanpitak, 2026IJERE 15(3) · 10.11591/ijere.v15i3.38478

(I − D) / D

I is importance or the desired mean. D is the current degree. The index is the gap relative to where the item stands now. Above 0.30 is high priority.

CPIChe, Chaemchoy & Siribanpitak, 2026IJERE 15(3) · 10.11591/ijere.v15i3.38478

PNI × (Impact / 5) × (Feasibility / 5)

Optional 1–5 ratings. The strongest composite score in the file is scaled to 1, so a wide gap with little impact or feasibility moves down the list.

Che, C., Chaemchoy, S., & Siribanpitak, P. (2026). Beyond diagnosis: Using PNI, modified and composite priority indices to orchestrate meta-skills-driven academic management innovation. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 15(3), 1862–1875. doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v15i3.38478

How to present the result

  1. Put the formula in the figure note, then the signature sticker: tool name, authors, year, and IJERE 15(3).
  2. Rank from the largest PNI modified and mark 0.30. Above that line is high priority.
  3. Show I and D next to the index. A large PNI modified can come from a modest gap when D is small.
  4. If CPI changes the order, show both lists. A wide gap with low impact or feasibility should move down.
  5. Use one row per item, with means already averaged. Do not collapse repeated names.

Use the file

CSV · Item, I, D · Impact and Feasibility optional

Download toolkit packBlank template